Analysis of Posyandu Status and Ownership of Health Service Facilities in the Area of Surakarta City Health Office: A Case Study of 2017-2021

Analisis Status Posyandu dan Kepemilikan Fasilitas Pelayanan Kesehatan di Wilayah Dinas Kesehatan Kota Surakarta: Studi Kasus Tahun 2017-2021

Authors

  • Farah Adilah Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
  • Noor Alis Setiyadi Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Keywords:

Posyandu Status, Health Service Ownership, Surakarta

Abstract

Background: Based on data from the Ministry of Home Affairs in 2022, the number of Posyandu has increased every year, but there are still many inactive Posyandu and reduced ownership of health services. Little information describes the status of Posyandu in each sub-district in a city and the ownership of health services in the health department of a city in the period 2017-2021. Objective: This study aims to analyze the status of Posyandu and describe the ownership of health services in the Surakarta City Health Office area in the 2017-2021 period. Methods: This study is a descriptive study based on data reports of active Posyandu and health service ownership facilities in the Surakarta City Health Office area in 2017-2021 reported by 17 Puskesmas from 5 Districts. The data used in this study are secondary data. The data obtained were then analyzed descriptively using graphs and tables. Results: Surakarta City has 5 sub-districts with 17 health center coverage areas. Sociodemographic data explains that the population density of Surakarta city in 2018 was 11,762 people, when compared to 2017, namely 11,722 people, there was an increase in population. The number of active Posyandu status in the Surakarta city health service area in 2017-2021 which has increased is in Banjarsari sub-district. The number of Health Service Ownership in Surakarta City in 2017-2021 which increased was owned by the Ministry of Health consisting of hospitals and other service facilities, the Provincial Government consisting of hospitals and other service facilities, and BUMN consisting of other service facilities and pharmaceutical production and distribution facilities. Conclusion: The increasing population in Surakarta city in the period 2017-2021 affects the increasing number of Posyandu and health services.

References

H. A. Nugroho and D. Nurdiana, “HUBUNGAN ANTARA PENGETAHUAN DAN MOTIVASI KADER POSYANDU DENGAN KEAKTIFAN KADER POSYANDU DI DESA DUKUH TENGAH KECAMATAN KETANGGUNGAN KABUPATEN BREBES,” FIKkeS, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2008.

M. Ashar and S. Patmanthara, “ALTERNATIF MEDIA KOMUNIKASI VISUALDALAM PRAKTEK PEMBELAJARAN KESEHATANDI PUSAT LAYANAN MASYARAKAT BERBASIS ICT,” J. Teknodik, pp. 055–061, 2018, doi: 10.32550/teknodik.v14i1.451.

S. A. Maghfiroh and R. D. Wulandari, “Evaluation of Posyandu Information Systems Using the Health Metric Network Model,” Indones. J. Public Heal., vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 439–450, 2022, doi: 10.20473/ijph.v17i3.2022.439-450.

N. Hafifah and Z. Abidin, “Peran Posyandu dalam Meningkatkan Kualitas Kesehatan Ibu dan Anak di Desa Sukawening, Kabupaten Bogor,” J. Pus. Inov. Masy., vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 893–900, 2020.

A. Faza et al., “Posyandu Application in Indonesia : From Health Informatics Policy Implementation,” Informatics, no. 9, p. 74, 2022.

E. Saepuddin, E. Rizal, and A. Rusmana, “Peran Posyandu sebagai Pusat Informasi Kesehatan Ibu dan Anak,” Rec. Libr. J., vol. 3, no. 2, p. 201, 2017.

A. Suharto, O. Soedirham, S. Suparji, and F. Hendriyani, “Behavior of mother to visit posyandu in magetan regency, indonesia,” Open Access Maced. J. Med. Sci., vol. 9, pp. 1590–1595, 2021, doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2021.6748.

Y. Saripawan and M. Hasanbasri, “Pengawasan pelaksanaan Program Posyandu di Kota Pontianak,” Dr. Diss. Univ. Gadjah Mada, 2007.

N. D. Nur Imanah and E. Sukmawati, “Peran Serta Kader Dalam Kegiatan Posyandu Balita Dengan Jumlah Kunjungan Balita Pada Era New Normal,” J. Kebidanan Indones., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 95–105, 2021, doi: 10.36419/jki.v12i1.442.

R. A. D. Sartika, “Analisis Pemanfaatan Program Pelayanan Kesehatan Status Gizi Balita,” J. Kesehat. Masy. Nas., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 1–8, 2010.

T. Aditya, “Analisis Kualitas Pelayanan Posyandu Camar Kelurahan Poris Plawad Utara Kecamatan Cipondoh Kota Tangerang,” J. Gov. Civ. Soc., vol. 1, no. 2, p. 203, 2018, doi: 10.31000/jgcs.v1i2.445.

B. A. Wandira, H. Hermiyanti, N. I. Suwendro, and K. Suarayasa, “Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Integrated Health Service for Child (Posyandu) Management in Palu City,” Open Access Maced. J. Med. Sci., vol. 10, pp. 243–247, 2022, doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2022.8149.

F. R. Rinawan et al., “Understanding mobile application development and implementation for monitoring Posyandu data in Indonesia: a 3-year hybrid action study to build ‘a bridge’ from the community to the national scale,” BMC Public Health, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 1–17, 2021, doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11035-w.

R. Ulfa and S. Syaiful, “Sosialisasi Pembangunan Fasilitas Posyandu Sebagai Pendukung Program Kesehatan Anak Dimasa Covid-19,” Pkm-P, vol. 4, no. 2, p. 255, 2020, doi: 10.32832/pkm-p.v4i2.752.

C. Kusuma et al., “Literature Review : Peran Kader Posyandu Terhadap Pemberdayaan Masyarakat,” Pros. Semin. Kesehat. Nas. Sexophone, vol. Juni, pp. 107–116, 2021.

D. Juliawan, Eko, Y. Prabandari, Suryo, and S. Hartini, T , Ninuk, “Evaluasi Program Pencegahan Gizi Buruk Melalui Promosi dan Pemantauan Pertumbuhan Anak Balita,” Ber. Kedokt. Masy., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 7–11, 2010, [Online]. Available: http://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/bkm/article/view/3476/3003

U. Fadlilah, G. Ariyanto, S. R. Hartono, E. T. Kurniawan, and S. Husein, “Peningkatan Kinerja Kader Posyandu dan Kualitas Pelayanan di Posyandu Lestari,” War. LPM, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 10–23, 2020, doi: 10.23917/warta.v23i1.8773.

Deni, “RS Pratama Sekubu Ditutup,” Radar Kaltara, 2018. https://kaltara.prokal.co/read/news/24855-rs-pratama-sebuku-ditutup%0D (accessed Dec. 10, 2018).

Bagian Humas dan Protokol, “2 Puskesmas di Kabupaten Magelang Alih Fungsi Menjadi Rumah Sakit Tipe D,” Bag. Adbang, 2015. https://bagian-adbang.magelangkab.go.id/home/detail/2-puskesmas-di-kabupaten-magelang-alih-fungsi-menjadi-rumah-sakit-tipe-d/41 (accessed Feb. 23, 2015).

Kemenkes RI, Pedoman Umum Pelayanan Posyandu, vol. 5, no. 2. 2017.

“Badan Pusat Statistik,” 2022. https://www.bps.go.id/publication.html?Publikasi%5BtahunJudul%5D=&Publikasi%5BkataKunci%5D=statistik+indonesia&Publikasi%5BcekJudul%5D=0&Publikasi%5BcekJudul%5D=1&yt0=Show

Kemenkes RI, Profil Kesehatan Indonesia 2021. 2022.

S. Siahaan, “Faktor yang Berpengaruh terhadap Pemanfaatan Fasilitas Pelayanan Kesehatan Swasta,” J. Penelit. dan Pengemb. Pelayanan Kesehat., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 87–94, 2018, doi: 10.22435/jpppk.v2i2.183.

Downloads

Published

2024-02-26

How to Cite

Adilah, F., & Setiyadi, N. A. (2024). Analysis of Posyandu Status and Ownership of Health Service Facilities in the Area of Surakarta City Health Office: A Case Study of 2017-2021: Analisis Status Posyandu dan Kepemilikan Fasilitas Pelayanan Kesehatan di Wilayah Dinas Kesehatan Kota Surakarta: Studi Kasus Tahun 2017-2021. Prosiding University Research Colloquium, 18, 158–167. Retrieved from https://repository.urecol.org/index.php/proceeding/article/view/2908