Comparing Turn Taking in Sessions of Different Courses

Authors

  • Malikatul Laila Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
  • Dwi Haryanti Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
  • Sigit Haryanto Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Keywords:

Turn Taking Variations, Online Learning, University Classroom Session

Abstract

The study discusses the turn taking made by lecturers and students during the online learning process. This study aims to find turn taking variations through online learning in university classroom sessions in the midst Covid-19 break. The research data are series of speeches in online learning in university classroom sessions collected from three different lectures session discourses produced by lecturers and students through Zoom and Google Meet. Data collection were done by using record and note taking techniques. Data were analyzed by applying the theory of turn taking rules of Sacks, Schegloff, & Jefferson's theory (1978). The results show that the variations of turn taking as in the online session as the application of rule 1 are dominated on the speaker teacher’s combining opinion or questions by confirming. In the meantime, the application of rule 3 is dominated on the speaker teacher’s self-repair. The use of teacher’s opinions and self- repair is implied to give a help to students for comprehending the online course.

References

Arsini. N. W. N.. Sutama. I. M.. & Indriani. M. S. (2014). Perilaku verbal dan nonverbal Guru ketika memberikan penguatan dalam pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia di SMP Negeri 1 Singaraja. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia Undiksha. 2(1).

Azhar. K. A.. & Iqbal. N. (2018). Turn-taking and gender differences in language classroom. Journal of NELTA. 23(1-2). 54-67.

Bailey. T.M.. Plunkett. K.. & Scarpa. E. (1999). A cross-linguistic study in learning prosodic rhythms: Rules. constraints. and similarity. Language and Speech. 42(1). 1– 38.

Bortfeld. H.. Leon. S. D.. Bloom. J. E.. Schober. M. F.. & Brennan. S. E. (2001). Disfluency rates in conversation: Effects of age. relationship. topic. role. and gender. Language and speech. 44(2). 123-147.

Coates. J.. & Sutton?Spence. R. (2001). Turn?taking patterns in deaf conversation. Journal of Sociolinguistics. 5(4). 507-529.

Coulthard. M. (1992). Advances in spoken discourse analysis. London: Routledge.

Effendy. Onong Uchjana. 2004. Dinamika Komunikasi. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Enriquez. M. A. S. (2014. March). Students’ Perceptions on the Effectiveness of the Use of Edmodo as a Supplementary Tool for Learning. In DLSU Research Congress. 1-6.

Garton. S. (2012). Speaking out of turn? Taking the initiative in teacher-fronted classroom interaction. Classroom Discourse. 3(1). 29-45.

Haqien. D.. & Rahman. A. A. (2020). Pemanfaatan Zoom Meeting Untuk Proses Pembelajaran Pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19. SAP (Susunan Artikel Pendidikan). 5(1).

Harahap. Z. A. (2019. December). Analisis percakapan pada interaksi Front Office (Teller) dengan nasabah dalam pelayanan transaksi keuangan di Bank. In Seminar Nasional Inovasi dalam Penelitian Sains. Teknologi dan Humaniora-InoBali. 294-301.

Iftakhar. S. (2016). Google classroom: what works and how. Journal of Education and Social Sciences. 3(1). 12-18.

Keevallik. L.. & Ekström. A. (2019). How to take the floor as a couple: Turn-taking in Lindy Hop jam circles. Visual Anthropology. 32(5). 423-444.

Kendrick. K. H. (2015). The intersection of turn-taking and repair: the timing of other- initiations of repair in conversation. Frontiers in psychology. 6(250). 10-3389.

Kumar. V.. & Nanda. P. (2019). Social media in higher education: A framework for continuous engagement. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education (IJICTE). 15(1). 97-108.

Laila. M. (2015). Strategi bertutur moderator untuk menggali informasi dalam diskusi Indonesia Lawyers Club. Prosiding Prasasti. 382-386.

Laila. M.. & Puspitasari. F. D. (2019). The Study of Turn Taking in ILC Discussion. Proceeding of The 2nd ICoLLiT (International Conference on Language. Literature and Teaching) 2019.

Macbeth. D. (2002). A commentary on instructional design. Journal of the Learning Sciences. 11(2-3). 373-386.

McHoul. A.W. (19i8). The organization of turns at formal talk in the classroom. Language in Society. 7. 183-213.

Mehan. H. (1979). Learning Lessons. Harvard University Press. Cambridge.

Mujianto. G. (2017). Karakteristik Tuturan Performatif Guru dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia Berdasarkan Pendekatan Saintifik. KEMBARA: Jurnal Keilmuan Bahasa. Sastra. dan Pengajarannya (e-Journal). 2(2). 172-186.

Mushin. I.. Gardner. R.. & Munro. J. M. (2013). Language matters in demonstrations of understanding in early years mathematics assessment. Mathematics Education Research Journal. 25(3). 415-433.

Novick. D. G.. Hansen. B.. & Ward. K. (1996). Coordinating turn-taking with gaze. In Proceeding of Fourth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing. ICSLP'96 (Vol. 3. pp. 1888-1891). IEEE.

Oreström. B. (1983).Turn-taking in English conversation. Lund: Gleerup.

Power. R. J.. & Dal Martello. M. F. (1986). Some criticisms of Sacks. Schegloff. and Jefferson on turn taking. Semiotica. 58(1-2). 29-40.

Pradana. W. A.. & Laila. M. (2020). Turn-taking in the Classroom Session in the Movie Freedom Writers by Richard La Gravanese. Ethical Lingua. 7(2). 281-287.

Prasetyono. R. N. (2020). Analisis penggunaan Google Meet berbasis android mobile dalam minat belajar mahasiswa Informatika. Indonesian Journal of Informatics and Research. 1(2). 84-90.

Roger. D.. Bull. P.. & Smith. S. (1988). The development of comprehensive system for classifying interruptions. Journal of Language and Social Psychology. 7(1). 27–34.

Sacks. H.. Schegloff. E. A.. & Jefferson. G. (1978). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn taking for conversation. In Studies in the organization of conversational interaction (pp. 7-55). Academic Press.

Schegloff. E.A. (2000). Overlapping talk and the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language in Society. 29. 1–63.

Schegloff. E. A. (1987). Recycled turn beginnings: A precise repair mechanism in

conversation’s turn-taking organization. Talk and social organisation. 1(1). 70-85.

Schegloff. E. A. (2007). Sequence Organization in Interaction. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge

Sicat. A. S. (2015). Enhancing college students’ proficiency in business writing via

Schoology. International Journal of Education and Research. 3(1). 159-178.

Sutrisno. S.. Simanjuntak. H.. & Lasmono. D. (2015). Analisis Tindak Tutur Pedagang dan Pembeli di Pasar Pemangkat Kabupaten Sambas. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa. 4(1).

Wahyuniarti. F. R. (2017). Tindak Elisitasi dalam Wacana Kelas: Kajian Mikroetnografi Terhadap Bahasa Guru. KEMBARA: Jurnal Keilmuan Bahasa. Sastra. dan Pengajarannya (e-Journal). 2(1). 31-39.

Zhafira. N. H.. Ertika. Y.. & Chairiyaton. C. (2020). Persepsi mahasiswa terhadap perkuliahan daring sebagai sarana pembelajaran. Jurnal Bisnis Dan Kajian Strategi Manajemen. 4(1).

Downloads

Published

2023-09-23

How to Cite

Laila, M., Haryanti, D., & Haryanto, S. (2023). Comparing Turn Taking in Sessions of Different Courses. Prosiding University Research Colloquium, 82–91. Retrieved from https://repository.urecol.org/index.php/proceeding/article/view/2692

Issue

Proceeding of The 17th University Research Colloquium 2023: Bidang Pendidikan, Humaniora dan Agama

Section

Articles

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.