Evaluasi Usabilitas Odoo dalam Proses Pembelajaran Human Resource Information System bagiMahasiswaPsikologi
Keywords:
Usabilitas, human resource information system, OdooAbstract
Sistem teknologi informasi yang berkaitan dengan bidang psikologi yang saat ini marak digunakan di dunia kerja antara lain adalah Enterprise Resource Planning Human Capital Management (ERPHCM). Tujuan penelitian ini adalah memberikan deskripsi tentang evaluasi usabilitas terhadap salah satu aplikasi ERP-HCM, yaitu Odoo yang digunakan untuk proses pembelajaran Human Resource Information System (HRIS). Aspek yang diuji yaitu learnability, flexibility, effectiveness, dan attitude. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah survei terhadap 49 mahasiswa yang telah mengikuti mata kuliah HRIS. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa nilai total usabilitas aplikasi Odoo mencapai 79,93%. Nilai tersebut diperoleh dari aspek learnability = 79,93%, flexibility = 73,46%, effectiveness = 77,55%, attitude = 80,61%. Hal ini berarti bahwa aplikasi Odoo layak digunakan dan dapat diterima dengan baik namun perlu dilakukan perbaikan-perbaikan berdasarkan kelemahan-kelemahan aplikasi Odoo.
References
Ali, M.R., Morris, T. (2012). Usability Evaluation Framework for Computer Vision Based
Interfaces. World Academy of Science. Engineering and Technology, 471–476.
Alshamari, M., Mayhew, P. (2009). Current issues of usability testing. IETE Technical Review,
26(6), 402-406.
Cato, J. (2001). User-centered web design. London, UK: Addison-Wesley.
Basana, S. R. & Tarigan, Z. J. H. (2011). Studi eksploratif aktivitas key user dalam
mengimplementasikan teknologi Enterprise Resources Planning (Studi Kasus 5
Perusahaan Manufaktur Jawa Timur). Research Paper. Diakses 03 Juli 2014.
http://repository.petra.ac.id/15904/.
Bailey, B.P., Konstan, J.A., & Carlis, J.V. (2001). The effects of interruptions on task
performance, annoyance, and anxiety in the user interface. In: Proceedings of IFIP
TC.13
International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 593–601). Amsterdam,
the
Netherlands: IOS Press.
Brown, M. E. (2015). Learning to use, useful for learning : a usability study of Google Apps for
education. Journal of Usabilities Studies. 10(4), 160–181.
Corbett, A.L., & Anderson, J. (2001). Locus of feedback control in computer-based tutoring:
impact on learning rate, achievement and attitudes. In: Proceedings of ACM Conference
on
Human Factors in Computer Systems, (pp. 245–252). New York, NY: ACM Press.
Drucker, S.M., Glatzer, A., De Mar, S., & Wong, C. (2002). SmartSkip: Consumer level
browsing and skipping of digital video content. In: Proceedings of ACM Conference on
Human Factors in Computer Systems (pp. 219–226). New York, NY: ACM Press.
Gaver, W.W., & Martin, H. (2000). Alternatives: exploring information appliances through
conceptual design proposals. In Proceedings of CHI'2000 (pp.209~216). New York,
NY:
ACM Press.
Hassenzahl, M. (2003). The thing and I: understanding the relationship between user and
product. In M.Blythe, C. Overbeeke, A. F. Monk, & P. C. Wright (Eds.), Funology:
From
usability to enjoyment (pp. 31-42). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic
Publishers.
Hertzum, M., & Jacobsen, .N.E. (2003). The evaluator effect: A chilling fact about usability
evaluation methods. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 15, 183-
204.
Hornbæk, K. & Frøkjær, E. (2005). Comparing usability problems and redesign proposals as
input to practical systems development. In: Proceedings of ACM Conference on Human
Factors in Computing Systems, (pp. 391-400). New York, NY: ACM Press.
IFS. (2014). IFS Indonesia. Diakses 6 Juli 2014.
http://www.ifsworld.com/id/news_events/our_customers/default.asp#.
Isbister, K.., & Nass, C. (2000). Consistency of personality in interactive characters: Verbal
cues,
non-verbal cues, and user characteristics. International journal of Human-Computer
Studies 53(2), 251-267.
ISO (International Organization for Standardization). (1998). ISO 9241-11:1998(E)
Levi, M.D., & Conrad, F.G. (2000). Usability testing of world wide web sites. Bureau of Labor
Statistics Research Papers. Diakses 6 Juli 2014. http://stats.bls.gov/ore/
htm_papers/st960150.htm.
McGrenere, J., Baecker, R.M., & Booth, K.S. (2002). An evaluation of a multiple interface
design solution for bloated software. In: Proceedings of ACM Conference on Human
Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 163–170). New York, NY: ACM.
Nørgaard, M., & Hornbæk, K. (2006) What do usability evaluators do in practice? An
explorative study of think-aloud testing. In Proceedings of Conference on Designing
Interactive Systems (pp. 209-218). New York, NY: ACM Press.
Pearrow, M. (2000). Web site usability handbook. Rockland, MA: Charles River Media.
Seffah, A., Donyaee, M., Kline, R., & Padda, H. (2006). Usability measurement and metrics: A
consolidated model. Software Quality, 14, 159-178.
Shackel, B. (1991). Usability context, framework, definition, design and evaluation. Dalam B.
Shackel and S. J. Richardson (Eds.). Human Factors for informatics Usability. New
York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Vermeeren, A., Kesteren, I., & Bekker, M. (2003) Managing the evaluator effect in user testing.
In Proceedings of INTERACT'03 (pp. 647-654). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: IOS Press.
Wallace, T. F. & Kremzar, M. H. (2001). ERP: Making it happen. The implementers? guide to
success with enterprise resource planning. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Zaharias, P., & Poylymenakou, A. (2009). Developing a usability evaluation method for
elearning applications: Beyond functional usability. International Journal of Human
Computer Studies, 25, 75-98
Interfaces. World Academy of Science. Engineering and Technology, 471–476.
Alshamari, M., Mayhew, P. (2009). Current issues of usability testing. IETE Technical Review,
26(6), 402-406.
Cato, J. (2001). User-centered web design. London, UK: Addison-Wesley.
Basana, S. R. & Tarigan, Z. J. H. (2011). Studi eksploratif aktivitas key user dalam
mengimplementasikan teknologi Enterprise Resources Planning (Studi Kasus 5
Perusahaan Manufaktur Jawa Timur). Research Paper. Diakses 03 Juli 2014.
http://repository.petra.ac.id/15904/.
Bailey, B.P., Konstan, J.A., & Carlis, J.V. (2001). The effects of interruptions on task
performance, annoyance, and anxiety in the user interface. In: Proceedings of IFIP
TC.13
International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 593–601). Amsterdam,
the
Netherlands: IOS Press.
Brown, M. E. (2015). Learning to use, useful for learning : a usability study of Google Apps for
education. Journal of Usabilities Studies. 10(4), 160–181.
Corbett, A.L., & Anderson, J. (2001). Locus of feedback control in computer-based tutoring:
impact on learning rate, achievement and attitudes. In: Proceedings of ACM Conference
on
Human Factors in Computer Systems, (pp. 245–252). New York, NY: ACM Press.
Drucker, S.M., Glatzer, A., De Mar, S., & Wong, C. (2002). SmartSkip: Consumer level
browsing and skipping of digital video content. In: Proceedings of ACM Conference on
Human Factors in Computer Systems (pp. 219–226). New York, NY: ACM Press.
Gaver, W.W., & Martin, H. (2000). Alternatives: exploring information appliances through
conceptual design proposals. In Proceedings of CHI'2000 (pp.209~216). New York,
NY:
ACM Press.
Hassenzahl, M. (2003). The thing and I: understanding the relationship between user and
product. In M.Blythe, C. Overbeeke, A. F. Monk, & P. C. Wright (Eds.), Funology:
From
usability to enjoyment (pp. 31-42). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic
Publishers.
Hertzum, M., & Jacobsen, .N.E. (2003). The evaluator effect: A chilling fact about usability
evaluation methods. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 15, 183-
204.
Hornbæk, K. & Frøkjær, E. (2005). Comparing usability problems and redesign proposals as
input to practical systems development. In: Proceedings of ACM Conference on Human
Factors in Computing Systems, (pp. 391-400). New York, NY: ACM Press.
IFS. (2014). IFS Indonesia. Diakses 6 Juli 2014.
http://www.ifsworld.com/id/news_events/our_customers/default.asp#.
Isbister, K.., & Nass, C. (2000). Consistency of personality in interactive characters: Verbal
cues,
non-verbal cues, and user characteristics. International journal of Human-Computer
Studies 53(2), 251-267.
ISO (International Organization for Standardization). (1998). ISO 9241-11:1998(E)
Levi, M.D., & Conrad, F.G. (2000). Usability testing of world wide web sites. Bureau of Labor
Statistics Research Papers. Diakses 6 Juli 2014. http://stats.bls.gov/ore/
htm_papers/st960150.htm.
McGrenere, J., Baecker, R.M., & Booth, K.S. (2002). An evaluation of a multiple interface
design solution for bloated software. In: Proceedings of ACM Conference on Human
Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 163–170). New York, NY: ACM.
Nørgaard, M., & Hornbæk, K. (2006) What do usability evaluators do in practice? An
explorative study of think-aloud testing. In Proceedings of Conference on Designing
Interactive Systems (pp. 209-218). New York, NY: ACM Press.
Pearrow, M. (2000). Web site usability handbook. Rockland, MA: Charles River Media.
Seffah, A., Donyaee, M., Kline, R., & Padda, H. (2006). Usability measurement and metrics: A
consolidated model. Software Quality, 14, 159-178.
Shackel, B. (1991). Usability context, framework, definition, design and evaluation. Dalam B.
Shackel and S. J. Richardson (Eds.). Human Factors for informatics Usability. New
York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Vermeeren, A., Kesteren, I., & Bekker, M. (2003) Managing the evaluator effect in user testing.
In Proceedings of INTERACT'03 (pp. 647-654). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: IOS Press.
Wallace, T. F. & Kremzar, M. H. (2001). ERP: Making it happen. The implementers? guide to
success with enterprise resource planning. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Zaharias, P., & Poylymenakou, A. (2009). Developing a usability evaluation method for
elearning applications: Beyond functional usability. International Journal of Human
Computer Studies, 25, 75-98
Downloads
Published
2018-02-21
How to Cite
Fahmie, A., Miranty, A., Agustina, I., Mulyati, R., Rachmawati, M. A., & Bantam, D. J. (2018). Evaluasi Usabilitas Odoo dalam Proses Pembelajaran Human Resource Information System bagiMahasiswaPsikologi. Prosiding University Research Colloquium, 215–224. Retrieved from https://repository.urecol.org/index.php/proceeding/article/view/63
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Arief Fahmie, Annisa Miranty, Ike Agustina, Rina Mulyati, Mira Aliza Rachmawati, Dian Juliarti Bantam
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
